Obama goed voor toerisme

Afrika heeft het aantal toeristen het afgelopen jaar zien stijgen, tegen de algemene trend in, zo meldt het Algemeen Dagblad. Het continent trok 5 procent meer vakantiereizigers. Wereldwijd nam het aantal toeristen met 4 procent af, aldus de organisatie van de VN voor toerisme, UNWTO, zo meldde de BBC. Volgens de VN-deskundigen kreeg het continent meer aandacht door het aantreden van president Barack Obama met zijn Afrikaanse achtergrond. Onder meer Amerikanen gingen een kijkje nemen in Obama’s geboorteland Kenia, aldus het Algemeen Dagblad. Ook dit jaar zal Afrika volgens de UNWTO niet te klagen hebben over bezoekers. Dat komt dan vooral doordat het WK voetbal deze zomer in Zuid-Afrika wordt gehouden.

In absolute getallen blijft Afrika overigens nog steeds duidelijk achter wat betreft toerisme. Van de circa 900 miljoen mensen die in 2009 met vakantie gingen, gingen er ongeveer 50 miljoen, ruim 5 procent, naar Afrika, aldus het Algemeen Dagblad.

Geplaatst in Nieuws/Amerika/VS | Tags: , | Plaats een reactie

Polarisatie

Het verschil in waardering voor een Amerikaanse president door aanhangers van de Democratische partij en de Republikeinse partij in de VS, is nog nooit zo groot geweest als in het eerste jaar van president Obama. Dat blijkt uit een opiniepeiling van Gallup, die op de website van het onderzoekbureau was te lezen.

Obama geniet de steun van 88 procent van zijn Democratische partijgenoten, terwijl slechts 23 procent van de Republikeinen waardering heeft voor de verrichtingen van Obama, zo meldt de Telegraaf. Het verschil van 65 procent overtreft het vorige record van president Bill Clinton. Het verschil was toen 52 procent in zijn eerste jaar. Over het hele jaar genomen kon Obama rekenen op de steun van 57 procent van alle Amerikanen. Bij zijn aantreden genoot hij de grootste steun voor een Amerikaanse president sinds de Tweede Wereldoorlog, maar onder Republikeinen werd die snel minder. Bij de Democraten is de waardering voor Obama nooit onder de 80 procent geweest, aldus de Telegraaf.

Obama zegt zich niet van de wijs te laten brengen door de dalende populariteitscijfers. “Ik heb dit al eens meegemaakt, in de verkiezingscampagne van 2008”, aldus de president in een interview met ABC. ”Als je populariteitscijfers dalen ben je een idioot, als je populariteitscijfers stijgen ben je een genie.” Obama zegt dat hij liever één termijn van vier jaar een goede president is dan twee termijnen van in totaal acht jaar een middelmatig staatshoofd. Hij wil daarom gewoon doorgaan met het doorvoeren van grote maar ook controversiële voornemens als de hervorming van de gezondheidszorg.

De polarisatie is niet opmerkelijk. Obama voert plannen door, zoals de hervorming van de gezondheidszorg en strengere regels voor banken en Wall Street. De Republikeinen, waar Obama graag mee wil samenwerken, blokkeren vrijwel alles. Dat Obama dan polariseert is dan niet zo verwonderlijk. Geen van beide partijen wil de ander tegemoet komen. Onder de regering Bush was dit overigens niet anders.

Geplaatst in Nieuws/Amerika/VS, Peilingen | Tags: , | Plaats een reactie

Lobby bankiers

De bankiers die afgelopen week deelnemen aan het World Economic Forum (WEF) in het Zwitserse Davos zouden volgens de krant The Financial Times van plan zijn om massaal te lobbyen tegen de plannen van president Barack Obama, zo meldt het Algemeen Dagblad. Die wil de banken in de VS beperkingen opleggen. Vooral het feit dat Obama de omvang van banken wil inperken, om het probleem van “too big to fail” in de toekomst te vermijden, stuit op heel wat weerstand. Volgens The Financial Times pleiten de bankiers voor andere oplossingen, aldus het Algemeen Dagblad.
Ze vrezen ook dat de plannen van Obama andere regeringen zullen inspireren. Naar verluidt zouden heel wat grote banken uit Europa en de VS afgevaardigden sturen naar de top. Jaarlijks brainstormen politici en zakenlui van over heel de wereld er over de problemen van de economie. De bankenkwestie zou de debatten domineren. Enkele landen zoals Frankrijk en Spanje zouden voorstander zijn van hervormingen, terwijl de Britten zich traditioneel sceptisch opstellen. Ook de “sociale crisis”, nu de werkloosheid explodeert, zou een belangrijk thema vormen van het WEF.

Tot slot was een speciale zitting voorzien rond Haïti. Dat land werd twee weken geleden getroffen door een zware aardbeving en de bedoeling was het debat aan te gaan over een heropbouw op lange termijn. Voor deze kwestie kwam ook Bill Clinton, als speciaal afgevaardigde van de VN, naar Davos.

Geplaatst in Nieuws/Amerika/VS | Tags: , | Plaats een reactie

Kort Nieuws

Steun Bush senior

Voormalig president George H.W. Bush en voormalig First Lady Barbara Bush steunen senator Kay Bailey Hutchison in haar poging om gouverneur te worden en de zittende Republikein Rick Perry in een voorverkiezing te verslaan. “She has proven herself as an effective leader for Texas”, aldus Bush senior tegenover journalisten tijdens een persconferentie. Lees meer hier.

De boodschap van Massachusetts

Candace Brooks is een Democraat die stemde op Martha Coakley en zij is onderdeel van de Massachusetts Message. “I literally stood over the ballot, and I was, like, almost Scott Brown”, aldus Brooks. “I was almost there.” Ze stemde bijna op de Republikein Scott Brown, bijna een jaar na haar enthousiasme over Barack Obama en ze switchte van “unenrolled” en ze zich liet registreren als een Democraat. Maar verandering does not come overnight. Met andere woorden, “change” heeft tijd nodig. Het systeem in Washington is al decennia lang hetzelfde is niet van de een op de andere dag te veranderen. Dat kost tijd en de Republikeinen handhaven liever de status quo, waardoor er voor de gemiddelde Amerikaan niets verandert, zoals voor Candace Brooks. Voor veel Amerikanen is Washington toch een ver van mijn bed show en de laatste jaren is het vertrouwen in de politiek en het Congres dramatisch gedaald.

Uitdager voor McCain

Slecht nieuws voor voormalig presidentskandidaat John McCain. De voormalige Republikeinse afgevaardigde van Arizona, J.D. Hayworth, is van plan McCain uit te dagen voor zijn zetel in de Senaat. De voormalige afgevaardigde die 6 termijnen in het Huis trad afgelopen week af als presentator van een conservatief radioprogramma in Phoenix. “We will formally announce at a later time, but we’re moving forward to challenge John McCain”, aldus Hayworth tegenover de Associated Press. “I think we all respect John. I think his place in history is secure. But after close to a quarter-century in Washington, it’s time for him to come home”, aldus Hayworth. Lees meer hier.

Belastingverhoging?

President Obama heeft concessies moeten doen aan Democraten en Republikeinen en veranderde van positie en steunt nu het idee om een financiële commissie in te stellen die kan voorstellen kan doen om de belastingen te verhogen en minder geld uit te geven om het begrotingstekort te verkleinen. “The only way to solve our long-term fiscal challenges is to solve it together – Democrats and Republicans”, aldus Obama in een verklaring. Lees meer hier.

Geen “change”?

Het Witte Huis wijst alle kritiek van de hand dat president Obama zijn belofte dat er “change” zou komen niet is na gekomen na 1 jaar presidentschap. Witte Huis adviseur Valerie Jarrett zei dat Obama “enormous change” heeft gebracht. “I think what we’ve seen is a dramatic difference in terms of how the United States is perceived around the world”, aldus Jarrett tegenover “Meet the Press” van NBC. Lees meer hier.

Geld verspild

Bijna 3 van de 4 Amerikanen denkt dat tenminste de helft van het geld van het stimuleringsplan van bijna 800 miljard dollar is verspild. Volgens een peiling van CNN/Opinion Research Corporation denkt 63 procent van de Amerikanen dat de projecten die in het plan werden opgenomen puur voor politieke redenen zijn bedacht en niet om de economie te helpen, terwijl 36 procent wel denkt dat de projecten wel de economie ten goede komen. Eenentwintig procent van de ondervraagden denkt dat bijna al het geld van het stimulusplan is verspild. “One reason why the economic stimulus bill is no longer popular with the American public is the perception that a lot of the money has been wasted. Six in ten believe that the projects in the stimulus bill were included for purely political reasons”, aldus directeur peilingen Keating Holland van CNN. Lees meer hier.

Zoon Biden niet in Senaat

Openbaar aanklager van Delaware, Beau Biden, de zoon van vice-president Joe Biden, zei afgelopen week dat hij niet voor de zetel in de Senaat gaat, die eens van zijn vader was. “I cannot and will not run for the United States Senate in 2010”, aldus Biden. “I will run for re-election as Attorney General.” Lees meer hier.

Boze kiezers

Zowel Democraten als Republikeinen werden afgelopen week wakker geschud met een nieuw perspectief voor de tussentijdse verkiezingen voor het Huis en een derde van de Senaat in november. Volgens veel politieke analisten is de verkiezing van Scott Brown in Massachusetts iets wat voor grote veranderingen kan zorgen. De Democraten proberen kiezers gerust te stellen dat de verliezen in Massachusetts, New Jersey en Virginia niet een nationale trend worden voor de Republikeinen. Maar de Democraten moeten zich wel afvragen waar het mis ging.

Met pensioen

Een nieuwe tegenslag voor de Democraten na het verlies van de zetel van Ted Kennedy. Een Democratische afgevaardigde uit Arkansas, Marion Berry, maakte bekend met pensioen te gaan. Ook in Delaware een tegenslag, waar de populaire openbaar aanklager Beau Biden bekend maakte dat hij niet voor de zetel gaat die van zijn vader, vice-president Biden, was (zie bericht Zoon Biden niet in Senaat). “The people deserve a representative who has the ability to rise to the numerous challenges that face our state and our nation”, aldus Berry. “As a lifelong farmer, time has taken its toll on my health and I am no longer able to serve the district with the vitality I once possessed. … I am at perfect peace with this decision and look forward to returning to the farm and my home state of Arkansas.” Lees meer hier.

Radio Palin

Sarah Palin Radio interviewde…………juist Sarah Palin afgelopen week. De voormalige gouverneur van Alaska en Republikeinse vice-presidentskandidaat kreeg geen moeilijke vragen, omdat de radio website zich promoot als “Governor Palin’s own ‘friendly’ media.’ “Sarah Palin Radio is an independent, hour-long program on wsRadio.com that supports Governor Sarah Palin and the ideals that she represents and is not affiliated with any organization”, aldus de show op de eigen website.

Liever 1 dan 2

President Obama zei afgelopen week dat hij door gaat met het ‘doordrukken’ van grote veranderingen op belangrijke onderwerpen, zoals de hervorming van de gezondheidszorg en schone energie, zelfs als dat zijn kansen op een herverkiezing in 2012 in gevaar brengt. “I’d rather be a really good one-term president than a mediocre two-term president”, aldus Obama in een interview met “World News” van ABC, waar van een deel op de website van ABC News stond. Obama hield afgelopen week zijn State of the Union. Zijn populariteit is gedaald, een jaar dat werd gedomineerd door de economische crisis, de oorlogen in Irak en Afghanistan en de poging van de Democraten om de wet over de gezondheidszorg door het Congres te loodsen. De president maakte van de gezondheidszorg zijn top prioriteit wat betreft zijn binnenlands beleid in 2009, maar switcht zijn focus nu naar het creëren van banen en economisch herstel en hulp voor de middenklasse. Lees meer hier.

Helpt het stimuleringsplan?

De meeste Amerikanen zeggen dat het economische stimuleringsplan van bijna 800 miljard dollar heeft geholpen dat de economische crisis niet nog erger werd, maar slechts een derde ziet persoonlijk voordeel van het plan, volgens een nieuwe nationale peiling. Een peiling van CNN/Opinion Research Corporation laat zien dat 12 procent van de Amerikanen vindt dat het plan de economie heeft geholpen en beter heeft gemaakt, terwijl 46 procent zegt dat “stabilized conditions.” Maar 22 procent van de ondervraagden zegt dat het stimuleringsplan geen effect heeft gehad op de economie en 19 procent zegt dat het juist dingen erger heeft gemaakt. “But Americans don’t see the same effect on their own personal lives”, aldus directeur peilingen Keating Holland van CNN (zie bericht Geld verspild). Lees meer hier.

Keuze gemaakt

Afgevaardigde Mike Pence van Indiana maakte afgelopen week bekend dat hij niet de Democratische senator Evan Bayh in november uitdaagt en dat hij gaat voor zijn herverkiezing voor zijn zetel in het Huis. Pence, die de voorzitter is van de House Republican Conference, maakte zijn besluit in een brief bekend dat op zijn Facebook pagina werd geplaatst. “After much prayer and deliberation, I have decided to remain in the House and to seek re-election to the 6th Congressional District in 2010”, aldus Pence (zie bericht Keuzes). Lees meer hier.

Spannende strijd Florida

De Republikeinse voorverkiezing tussen gouverneur Charlie Crist en Marco Rubio in Florida voor een zetel in de Senaat beloofd spannend te worden. Volgens een nieuwe peiling heeft Rubio het gat tussen hem en Crist gedicht. Sterker nog, Rubio ligt nu zelfs voor. Een peiling van Quinnipiac University laat zien dat Rubio 47 procent van de stemmen zou krijgen en Crist 44 procent in de primary. Lees meer hier.

Palin niet op billboard

Het billboard op Time Square waar Obama een jas van de het merk Weatherproof draagt is inmiddels verwijderd. Maar het bedrijf ging vervolgens op zoek naar een andere politicus die zou passen bij de slogan “A leader in style.” Het bedrijf kwam uit bij voormalig vice-presidentskandidaat Sarah Palin, die ook al een keer gefotografeerd is in een jas van het merk. Weatherproof diende een verzoek in voor toestemming, maar de advocaat van Palin heeft het verzoek afgewezen, aldus CNN. Het bedrijf weet nog niet wie ze nu gaan benaderen (zie bericht Billboard verwijderd).

 

Positief over State of the Union

Bijna de helft van de Amerikanen die de State of the Union van president Obama zagen waren zeer positief over de toespraak, aldus een peiling. Een peiling van CNN/Opinion Research Corporation laat zien dat 48 procent van de mensen die de rede zagen een zeer positieve reactie gaven. Drie van de tien ondervragen waren positief en 21 procent gaf een negatieve reactie. Lees meer hier.

Bernanke opnieuw benoemd

De voorzitter van de Amerikaanse centrale bank, de Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke, is door de Senaat benoemd voor een tweede termijn. Bernanke werd met ruime meerderheid, 70 stemmen voor en 30 stemmen tegen, opnieuw benoemd. Lees meer hier.

Geplaatst in Belastingen, Joe Biden/President Biden, John McCain, Mike Pence/Vicepresident Pence, Nieuws/Amerika/VS, Peilingen, Sarah Palin, Senaat | Tags: , , , , | Plaats een reactie

Obama: “Band met burger herstellen”

President Obama gaf in zijn State of the Union aan dat hij de band met de Amerikaanse burger probeert te herstellen. Het deed denken aan de beroemde fireside chats van president Franklin D. Roosevelt die zich rechtstreeks wendde tot de bevolking over de hoofden van de congresleden heen, zo meldt de Telegraaf. Het is heel goed dat Obama dit heeft gedaan en het was ook nodig, aldus Amerika kenner en publicist Frans Verhagen in zijn analyse van de speech die Obama in het Congres hield. “Zijn State of the Union was goed, niet in de topcategorie, maar een werktoespraak”, aldus Verhagen. Dat de economie de boventoon voerde in de toespraak, vindt Verhagen logisch gezien de omstandigheden. “De focus lag bij de middenklasse. Dat hoort bij de Democraten. Aan de middleclass ontleent Amerika zijn kracht. Bovendien is de middenklasse verantwoordelijk voor een behoorlijke belastingbasis waarmee de lagere klassen kunnen worden geholpen”, aldus Verhagen.

Obama heeft in deze State of the Union het beleid van zijn voorganger George Bush subtiel aan de orde gesteld, concludeert Verhagen. Hij vindt dat Obama dat tot nu toe te weinig heeft gedaan. “Hij wees er bij elk onderwerp subtiel op dat Bush en zijn regering een puinhoop hebben achtergelaten”, aldus Verhagen. Obama noemde de laatste tien jaar dan ook “the lost decade”. Aan de andere kant nam Obama ook de schuld op zich van dingen die het afgelopen jaar zijn fout gegaan en legde uit hoe dat is gekomen, aldus de Telegraaf.

Verhagen vindt het aspect van de hervorming van de gezondheidszorg het beste deel van de toespraak. “Het was de conversatietoon met het publiek over het waarom hij dit onderwerp heeft aangepakt. Een sterk stukje”, meent Verhagen. De buitenlandse politiek kwam nauwelijks aan de orde. “Begrijpelijk”, aldus Verhagen. “De meeste aspecten van de buitenlandpolitiek staan op de rails.” De conclusie van Verhagen: “Het was een vechttoespraak zonder dat hij al te agressief overkwam. Het was een noodzakelijke toespraak die adequaat is afgeleverd. Maar nu aan het werk.”

Geplaatst in Nieuws/Amerika/VS | Tags: , , | Plaats een reactie

Lonen bevriezen

President Obama bevriest dit jaar opnieuw de lonen van de staf van het Witte Huis als gebaar naar Amerikanen die gebukt gaan onder de zwaarste economische crisis in decennia, zo meldt de Telegraaf. Dat maakte Obama tijdens zijn eerste State of the Union bekend. De Amerikaanse krant Washington Post meldde dat het een vervolg is op een plan dat de president vorig jaar introduceerde. De lonen van regeringsfunctionarissen die meer dan 100.000 dollar (ruim 70.000 euro) per jaar verdienen, werden toen al bevroren. Ook bonussen worden niet meer uitgekeerd.

Geplaatst in Nieuws/Amerika/VS | Tags: , , | Plaats een reactie

Beeld Obama weg

Een beeld van Barack Obama als 10-jarig kind dat sinds december het Mentengpark in het centrum van Jakarta siert, wordt vanwege een protestactie mogelijk weggehaald, zo meldt de Telegraaf. Tegenstanders van het beeld willen dat op de plek niet de huidige Amerikaanse president maar een belangrijke Indonesiër wordt geëerd. Ze hebben op de sociale netwerksite Facebook een petitie tegen het beeld geplaatst, die 55.000 mensen inmiddels hebben ondertekend, aldus de Telegraaf. “We hebben de afgelopen twee weken gepraat over wat we met het beeld moeten doen. Of we het moeten verwijderen of elders moeten plaatsen. We zullen de beste oplossing vinden”, zei een functionaris van de parkdienst van Jakarta. Het beeld, dat 100 miljoen roepia ( 7200 euro) heeft gekost, is gebaseerd op een foto van Obama in zijn kinderjaren. Hij draagt een korte broek en een T-shirt en heeft een grote halsband met een vlinder op zijn hand.

Geplaatst in Nieuws/Amerika/VS | Tags: , | Plaats een reactie

State of the Union president Obama

Hieronder de gehele tekst van de State of the Union van president Obama.

Madame Speaker, Vice President Biden, Members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow Americans:

Our Constitution declares that from time to time, the President shall give to Congress information about the state of our union. For two hundred and twenty years, our leaders have fulfilled this duty. They have done so during periods of prosperity and tranquility. And they have done so in the midst of war and depression; at moments of great strife and great struggle.

It’s tempting to look back on these moments and assume that our progress was inevitable – that America was always destined to succeed. But when the Union was turned back at Bull Run and the Allies first landed at Omaha Beach, victory was very much in doubt. When the market crashed on Black Tuesday and civil rights marchers were beaten on Bloody Sunday, the future was anything but certain. These were times that tested the courage of our convictions, and the strength of our union. And despite all our divisions and disagreements; our hesitations and our fears; America prevailed because we chose to move forward as one nation, and one people. Again, we are tested. And again, we must answer history’s call.

One year ago, I took office amid two wars, an economy rocked by severe recession, a financial system on the verge of collapse, and a government deeply in debt. Experts from across the political spectrum warned that if we did not act, we might face a second depression. So we acted – immediately and aggressively. And one year later, the worst of the storm has passed.

But the devastation remains. One in ten Americans still cannot find work. Many businesses have shuttered. Home values have declined. Small towns and rural communities have been hit especially hard. For those who had already known poverty, life has become that much harder.

This recession has also compounded the burdens that America’s families have been dealing with for decades – the burden of working harder and longer for less; of being unable to save enough to retire or help kids with college.

So I know the anxieties that are out there right now. They’re not new. These struggles are the reason I ran for President. These struggles are what I’ve witnessed for years in places like Elkhart, Indiana and Galesburg, Illinois. I hear about them in the letters that I read each night. The toughest to read are those written by children – asking why they have to move from their home, or when their mom or dad will be able to go back to work.

For these Americans and so many others, change has not come fast enough. Some are frustrated; some are angry. They don’t understand why it seems like bad behavior on Wall Street is rewarded but hard work on Main Street isn’t; or why Washington has been unable or unwilling to solve any of our problems. They are tired of the partisanship and the shouting and the pettiness. They know we can’t afford it. Not now.

So we face big and difficult challenges. And what the American people hope – what they deserve – is for all of us, Democrats and Republicans, to work through our differences; to overcome the numbing weight of our politics. For while the people who sent us here have different backgrounds, different stories and different beliefs, the anxieties they face are the same. The aspirations they hold are shared. A job that pays the bills. A chance to get ahead. Most of all, the ability to give their children a better life.

You know what else they share? They share a stubborn resilience in the face of adversity. After one of the most difficult years in our history, they remain busy building cars and teaching kids; starting businesses and going back to school. They’re coaching little league and helping their neighbors. As one woman wrote me, “We are strained but hopeful, struggling but encouraged.”

It is because of this spirit – this great decency and great strength – that I have never been more hopeful about America’s future than I am tonight. Despite our hardships, our union is strong. We do not give up. We do not quit. We do not allow fear or division to break our spirit. In this new decade, it’s time the American people get a government that matches their decency; that embodies their strength. And tonight, I’d like to talk about how together, we can deliver on that promise. It begins with our economy.

Our most urgent task upon taking office was to shore up the same banks that helped cause this crisis. It was not easy to do. And if there’s one thing that has unified Democrats and Republicans, it’s that we all hated the bank bailout. I hated it. You hated it. It was about as popular as a root canal.

But when I ran for President, I promised I wouldn’t just do what was popular – I would do what was necessary. And if we had allowed the meltdown of the financial system, unemployment might be double what it is today. More businesses would certainly have closed. More homes would have surely been lost.

So I supported the last administration’s efforts to create the financial rescue program. And when we took the program over, we made it more transparent and accountable. As a result, the markets are now stabilized, and we have recovered most of the money we spent on the banks.

To recover the rest, I have proposed a fee on the biggest banks. I know Wall Street isn’t keen on this idea, but if these firms can afford to hand out big bonuses again, they can afford a modest fee to pay back the taxpayers who rescued them in their time of need.

As we stabilized the financial system, we also took steps to get our economy growing again, save as many jobs as possible, and help Americans who had become unemployed. That’s why we extended or increased unemployment benefits for more than 18 million Americans; made health insurance 65% cheaper for families who get their coverage through COBRA; and passed 25 different tax cuts.

Let me repeat: we cut taxes. We cut taxes for 95% of working families. We cut taxes for small businesses. We cut taxes for first-time homebuyers. We cut taxes for parents trying to care for their children. We cut taxes for 8 million Americans paying for college. As a result, millions of Americans had more to spend on gas, and food, and other necessities, all of which helped businesses keep more workers. And we haven’t raised income taxes by a single dime on a single person. Not a single dime.

Because of the steps we took, there are about two million Americans working right now who would otherwise be unemployed. 200,000 work in construction and clean energy. 300,000 are teachers and other education workers. Tens of thousands are cops, firefighters, correctional officers, and first responders. And we are on track to add another one and a half million jobs to this total by the end of the year.

The plan that has made all of this possible, from the tax cuts to the jobs, is the Recovery Act. That’s right – the Recovery Act, also known as the Stimulus Bill. Economists on the left and the right say that this bill has helped saved jobs and avert disaster. But you don’t have to take their word for it. Talk to the small business in Phoenix that will triple its workforce because of the Recovery Act. Talk to the window manufacturer in Philadelphia who said he used to be skeptical about the Recovery Act, until he had to add two more work shifts just because of the business it created. Talk to the single teacher raising two kids who was told by her principal in the last week of school that because of the Recovery Act, she wouldn’t be laid off after all.

There are stories like this all across America. And after two years of recession, the economy is growing again. Retirement funds have started to gain back some of their value. Businesses are beginning to invest again, and slowly some are starting to hire again.

But I realize that for every success story, there are other stories, of men and women who wake up with the anguish of not knowing where their next paycheck will come from; who send out resumes week after week and hear nothing in response. That is why jobs must be our number one focus in 2010, and that is why I am calling for a new jobs bill tonight.

Now, the true engine of job creation in this country will always be America’s businesses. But government can create the conditions necessary for businesses to expand and hire more workers.

We should start where most new jobs do – in small businesses, companies that begin when an entrepreneur takes a chance on a dream, or a worker decides its time she became her own boss.

Through sheer grit and determination, these companies have weathered the recession and are ready to grow. But when you talk to small business owners in places like Allentown, Pennsylvania or Elyria, Ohio, you find out that even though banks on Wall Street are lending again, they are mostly lending to bigger companies. But financing remains difficult for small business owners across the country.

So tonight, I’m proposing that we take $30 billion of the money Wall Street banks have repaid and use it to help community banks give small businesses the credit they need to stay afloat. I am also proposing a new small business tax credit – one that will go to over one million small businesses who hire new workers or raise wages. While we’re at it, let’s also eliminate all capital gains taxes on small business investment; and provide a tax incentive for all businesses, large and small, to invest in new plants and equipment.

Next, we can put Americans to work today building the infrastructure of tomorrow. From the first railroads to the interstate highway system, our nation has always been built to compete. There’s no reason Europe or China should have the fastest trains, or the new factories that manufacture clean energy products.

Tomorrow, I’ll visit Tampa, Florida, where workers will soon break ground on a new high-speed railroad funded by the Recovery Act. There are projects like that all across this country that will create jobs and help our nation move goods, services, and information. We should put more Americans to work building clean energy facilities, and give rebates to Americans who make their homes more energy efficient, which supports clean energy jobs. And to encourage these and other businesses to stay within our borders, it’s time to finally slash the tax breaks for companies that ship our jobs overseas and give those tax breaks to companies that create jobs in the United States of America.

The House has passed a jobs bill that includes some of these steps. As the first order of business this year, I urge the Senate to do the same. People are out of work. They are hurting. They need our help. And I want a jobs bill on my desk without delay.

But the truth is, these steps still won’t make up for the seven million jobs we’ve lost over the last two years. The only way to move to full employment is to lay a new foundation for long-term economic growth, and finally address the problems that America’s families have confronted for years.

We cannot afford another so-called economic “expansion” like the one from last decade – what some call the “lost decade” – where jobs grew more slowly than during any prior expansion; where the income of the average American household declined while the cost of health care and tuition reached record highs; where prosperity was built on a housing bubble and financial speculation.

From the day I took office, I have been told that addressing our larger challenges is too ambitious – that such efforts would be too contentious, that our political system is too gridlocked, and that we should just put things on hold for awhile.

For those who make these claims, I have one simple question: How long should we wait? How long should America put its future on hold You see, Washington has been telling us to wait for decades, even as the problems have grown worse. Meanwhile, China’s not waiting to revamp its economy. Germany’s not waiting. India’s not waiting. These nations aren’t standing still. These nations aren’t playing for second place. They’re putting more emphasis on math and science. They’re rebuilding their infrastructure. They are making serious investments in clean energy because they want those jobs.

Well I do not accept second-place for the United States of America. As hard as it may be, as uncomfortable and contentious as the debates may be, it’s time to get serious about fixing the problems that are hampering our growth.

One place to start is serious financial reform. Look, I am not interested in punishing banks, I’m interested in protecting our economy. A strong, healthy financial market makes it possible for businesses to access credit and create new jobs. It channels the savings of families into investments that raise incomes. But that can only happen if we guard against the same recklessness that nearly brought down our entire economy.

We need to make sure consumers and middle-class families have the information they need to make financial decisions. We can’t allow financial institutions, including those that take your deposits, to take risks that threaten the whole economy. The House has already passed financial reform with many of these changes. And the lobbyists are already trying to kill it. Well, we cannot let them win this fight. And if the bill that ends up on my desk does not meet the test of real reform, I will send it back.

Next, we need to encourage American innovation. Last year, we made the largest investment in basic research funding in history – an investment that could lead to the world’s cheapest solar cells or treatment that kills cancer cells but leaves healthy ones untouched. And no area is more ripe for such innovation than energy. You can see the results of last year’s investment in clean energy – in the North Carolina company that will create 1200 jobs nationwide helping to make advanced batteries; or in the California business that will put 1,000 people to work making solar panels.

But to create more of these clean energy jobs, we need more production, more efficiency, more incentives. That means building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants in this country. It means making tough decisions about opening new offshore areas for oil and gas development. It means continued investment in advanced biofuels and clean coal technologies. And yes, it means passing a comprehensive energy and climate bill with incentives that will finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy in America.

I am grateful to the House for passing such a bill last year. This year, I am eager to help advance the bipartisan effort in the Senate. I know there have been questions about whether we can afford such changes in a tough economy; and I know that there are those who disagree with the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change. But even if you doubt the evidence, providing incentives for energy efficiency and clean energy are the right thing to do for our future – because the nation that leads the clean energy economy will be the nation that leads the global economy. And America must be that nation.

Third, we need to export more of our goods. Because the more products we make and sell to other countries, the more jobs we support right here in America. So tonight, we set a new goal: We will double our exports over the next five years, an increase that will support two million jobs in America. To help meet this goal, we’re launching a National Export Initiative that will help farmers and small businesses increase their exports, and reform export controls consistent with national security.

We have to seek new markets aggressively, just as our competitors are. If America sits on the sidelines while other nations sign trade deals, we will lose the chance to create jobs on our shores. But realizing those benefits also means enforcing those agreements so our trading partners play by the rules. And that’s why we will continue to shape a Doha trade agreement that opens global markets, and why we will strengthen our trade relations in Asia and with key partners like South Korea, Panama, and Colombia.

Fourth, we need to invest in the skills and education of our people. This year, we have broken through the stalemate between left and right by launching a national competition to improve our schools. The idea here is simple: instead of rewarding failure, we only reward success. Instead of funding the status quo, we only invest in reform – reform that raises student achievement, inspires students to excel in math and science, and turns around failing schools that steal the future of too many young Americans, from rural communities to inner-cities. In the 21st century, one of the best anti-poverty programs is a world-class education. In this country, the success of our children cannot depend more on where they live than their potential.

When we renew the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, we will work with Congress to expand these reforms to all fifty states. Still, in this economy, a high school diploma no longer guarantees a good job. I urge the Senate to follow the House and pass a bill that will revitalize our community colleges, which are a career pathway to the children of so many working families. To make college more affordable, this bill will finally end the unwarranted taxpayer-subsidies that go to banks for student loans. Instead, let’s take that money and give families a $10,000 tax credit for four years of college and increase Pell Grants. And let’s tell another one million students that when they graduate, they will be required to pay only ten percent of their income on student loans, and all of their debt will be forgiven after twenty years – and forgiven after ten years if they choose a career in public service. Because in the United States of America, no one should go broke because they chose to go to college. And it’s time for colleges and universities to get serious about cutting their own costs – because they too have a responsibility to help solve this problem.

Now, the price of college tuition is just one of the burdens facing the middle-class. That’s why last year I asked Vice President Biden to chair a task force on Middle-Class Families. That’s why we’re nearly doubling the child care tax credit, and making it easier to save for retirement by giving every worker access to a retirement account and expanding the tax credit for those who start a nest egg. That’s why we’re working to lift the value of a family’s single largest investment – their home. The steps we took last year to shore up the housing market have allowed millions of Americans to take out new loans and save an average of $1,500 on mortgage payments. This year, we will step up re-financing so that homeowners can move into more affordable mortgages. And it is precisely to relieve the burden on middle-class families that we still need health insurance reform.

Now let’s be clear – I did not choose to tackle this issue to get some legislative victory under my belt. And by now it should be fairly obvious that I didn’t take on health care because it was good politics.

I took on health care because of the stories I’ve heard from Americans with pre-existing conditions whose lives depend on getting coverage; patients who’ve been denied coverage; and families – even those with insurance – who are just one illness away from financial ruin.

After nearly a century of trying, we are closer than ever to bringing more security to the lives of so many Americans. The approach we’ve taken would protect every American from the worst practices of the insurance industry. It would give small businesses and uninsured Americans a chance to choose an affordable health care plan in a competitive market. It would require every insurance plan to cover preventive care. And by the way, I want to acknowledge our First Lady, Michelle Obama, who this year is creating a national movement to tackle the epidemic of childhood obesity and make our kids healthier.

Our approach would preserve the right of Americans who have insurance to keep their doctor and their plan. It would reduce costs and premiums for millions of families and businesses. And according to the Congressional Budget Office – the independent organization that both parties have cited as the official scorekeeper for Congress – our approach would bring down the deficit by as much as $1 trillion over the next two decades.

Still, this is a complex issue, and the longer it was debated, the more skeptical people became. I take my share of the blame for not explaining it more clearly to the American people. And I know that with all the lobbying and horse-trading, this process left most Americans wondering what’s in it for them.

But I also know this problem is not going away. By the time I’m finished speaking tonight, more Americans will have lost their health insurance. Millions will lose it this year. Our deficit will grow. Premiums will go up. Patients will be denied the care they need. Small business owners will continue to drop coverage altogether. I will not walk away from these Americans, and neither should the people in this chamber.

As temperatures cool, I want everyone to take another look at the plan we’ve proposed. There’s a reason why many doctors, nurses, and health care experts who know our system best consider this approach a vast improvement over the status quo. But if anyone from either party has a better approach that will bring down premiums, bring down the deficit, cover the uninsured, strengthen Medicare for seniors, and stop insurance company abuses, let me know. Here’s what I ask of Congress, though: Do not walk away from reform. Not now. Not when we are so close. Let us find a way to come together and finish the job for the American people.

Now, even as health care reform would reduce our deficit, it’s not enough to dig us out of a massive fiscal hole in which we find ourselves. It’s a challenge that makes all others that much harder to solve, and one that’s been subject to a lot of political posturing.

So let me start the discussion of government spending by setting the record straight. At the beginning of the last decade, America had a budget surplus of over $200 billion. By the time I took office, we had a one year deficit of over $1 trillion and projected deficits of $8 trillion over the next decade. Most of this was the result of not paying for two wars, two tax cuts, and an expensive prescription drug program. On top of that, the effects of the recession put a $3 trillion hole in our budget. That was before I walked in the door.

Now if we had taken office in ordinary times, I would have liked nothing more than to start bringing down the deficit. But we took office amid a crisis, and our efforts to prevent a second Depression have added another $1 trillion to our national debt.

I am absolutely convinced that was the right thing to do. But families across the country are tightening their belts and making tough decisions. The federal government should do the same. So tonight, I’m proposing specific steps to pay for the $1 trillion that it took to rescue the economy last year.

Starting in 2011, we are prepared to freeze government spending for three years. Spending related to our national security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security will not be affected. But all other discretionary government programs will. Like any cash-strapped family, we will work within a budget to invest in what we need and sacrifice what we don’t. And if I have to enforce this discipline by veto, I will.

We will continue to go through the budget line by line to eliminate programs that we can’t afford and don’t work. We’ve already identified $20 billion in savings for next year. To help working families, we will extend our middle-class tax cuts. But at a time of record deficits, we will not continue tax cuts for oil companies, investment fund managers, and those making over $250,000 a year. We just can’t afford it.

Now, even after paying for what we spent on my watch, we will still face the massive deficit we had when I took office. More importantly, the cost of Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security will continue to skyrocket. That’s why I’ve called for a bipartisan, Fiscal Commission, modeled on a proposal by Republican Judd Gregg and Democrat Kent Conrad. This can’t be one of those Washington gimmicks that lets us pretend we solved a problem. The Commission will have to provide a specific set of solutions by a certain deadline. Yesterday, the Senate blocked a bill that would have created this commission. So I will issue an executive order that will allow us to go forward, because I refuse to pass this problem on to another generation of Americans. And when the vote comes tomorrow, the Senate should restore the pay-as-you-go law that was a big reason why we had record surpluses in the 1990s.

I know that some in my own party will argue that we cannot address the deficit or freeze government spending when so many are still hurting. I agree, which is why this freeze will not take effect until next year, when the economy is stronger. But understand – if we do not take meaningful steps to rein in our debt, it could damage our markets, increase the cost of borrowing, and jeopardize our recovery – all of which could have an even worse effect on our job growth and family incomes.

From some on the right, I expect we’ll hear a different argument – that if we just make fewer investments in our people, extend tax cuts for wealthier Americans, eliminate more regulations, and maintain the status quo on health care, our deficits will go away. The problem is, that’s what we did for eight years. That’s what helped lead us into this crisis. It’s what helped lead to these deficits. And we cannot do it again.

Rather than fight the same tired battles that have dominated Washington for decades, it’s time to try something new. Let’s invest in our people without leaving them a mountain of debt. Let’s meet our responsibility to the citizens who sent us here. Let’s try common sense.

To do that, we have to recognize that we face more than a deficit of dollars right now. We face a deficit of trust – deep and corrosive doubts about how Washington works that have been growing for years. To close that credibility gap we must take action on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue to end the outsized influence of lobbyists; to do our work openly; and to give our people the government they deserve.

That’s what I came to Washington to do. That’s why – for the first time in history – my Administration posts our White House visitors online. And that’s why we’ve excluded lobbyists from policy-making jobs or seats on federal boards and commissions.

But we can’t stop there. It’s time to require lobbyists to disclose each contact they make on behalf of a client with my Administration or Congress. And it’s time to put strict limits on the contributions that lobbyists give to candidates for federal office. Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests – including foreign corporations – to spend without limit in our elections. Well I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people, and that’s why I’m urging Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to right this wrong.

I’m also calling on Congress to continue down the path of earmark reform. You have trimmed some of this spending and embraced some meaningful change. But restoring the public trust demands more. For example, some members of Congress post some earmark requests online. Tonight, I’m calling on Congress to publish all earmark requests on a single website before there’s a vote so that the American people can see how their money is being spent. Of course, none of these reforms will even happen if we don’t also reform how we work with one another.

Now, I am not naïve. I never thought the mere fact of my election would usher in peace, harmony, and some post-partisan era. I knew that both parties have fed divisions that are deeply entrenched. And on some issues, there are simply philosophical differences that will always cause us to part ways. These disagreements, about the role of government in our lives, about our national priorities and our national security, have been taking place for over two hundred years. They are the very essence of our democracy.

But what frustrates the American people is a Washington where every day is Election Day. We cannot wage a perpetual campaign where the only goal is to see who can get the most embarrassing headlines about their opponent – a belief that if you lose, I win. Neither party should delay or obstruct every single bill just because they can. The confirmation of well-qualified public servants should not be held hostage to the pet projects or grudges of a few individual Senators. Washington may think that saying anything about the other side, no matter how false, is just part of the game. But it is precisely such politics that has stopped either party from helping the American people. Worse yet, it is sowing further division among our citizens and further distrust in our government.

So no, I will not give up on changing the tone of our politics. I know it’s an election year. And after last week, it is clear that campaign fever has come even earlier than usual. But we still need to govern. To Democrats, I would remind you that we still have the largest majority in decades, and the people expect us to solve some problems, not run for the hills. And if the Republican leadership is going to insist that sixty votes in the Senate are required to do any business at all in this town, then the responsibility to govern is now yours as well. Just saying no to everything may be good short-term politics, but it’s not leadership. We were sent here to serve our citizens, not our ambitions. So let’s show the American people that we can do it together. This week, I’ll be addressing a meeting of the House Republicans. And I would like to begin monthly meetings with both the Democratic and Republican leadership. I know you can’t wait.

Throughout our history, no issue has united this country more than our security. Sadly, some of the unity we felt after 9/11 has dissipated. We can argue all we want about who’s to blame for this, but I am not interested in re-litigating the past. I know that all of us love this country. All of us are committed to its defense. So let’s put aside the schoolyard taunts about who is tough. Let’s reject the false choice between protecting our people and upholding our values. Let’s leave behind the fear and division, and do what it takes to defend our nation and forge a more hopeful future – for America and the world.

That is the work we began last year. Since the day I took office, we have renewed our focus on the terrorists who threaten our nation. We have made substantial investments in our homeland security and disrupted plots that threatened to take American lives. We are filling unacceptable gaps revealed by the failed Christmas attack, with better airline security, and swifter action on our intelligence. We have prohibited torture and strengthened partnerships from the Pacific to South Asia to the Arabian Peninsula. And in the last year, hundreds of Al Qaeda’s fighters and affiliates, including many senior leaders, have been captured or killed – far more than in 2008.

In Afghanistan, we are increasing our troops and training Afghan Security Forces so they can begin to take the lead in July of 2011, and our troops can begin to come home. We will reward good governance, reduce corruption, and support the rights of all Afghans – men and women alike. We are joined by allies and partners who have increased their own commitment, and who will come together tomorrow in London to reaffirm our common purpose. There will be difficult days ahead. But I am confident we will succeed.

As we take the fight to al Qaeda, we are responsibly leaving Iraq to its people. As a candidate, I promised that I would end this war, and that is what I am doing as President. We will have all of our combat troops out of Iraq by the end of this August. We will support the Iraqi government as they hold elections, and continue to partner with the Iraqi people to promote regional peace and prosperity. But make no mistake: this war is ending, and all of our troops are coming home.

Tonight, all of our men and women in uniform – in Iraq, Afghanistan, and around the world – must know that they have our respect, our gratitude, and our full support. And just as they must have the resources they need in war, we all have a responsibility to support them when they come home. That is why we made the largest increase in investments for veterans in decades. That is why we are building a 21st century VA. And that is why Michelle has joined with Jill Biden to forge a national commitment to support military families.

Even as we prosecute two wars, we are also confronting perhaps the greatest danger to the American people – the threat of nuclear weapons. I have embraced the vision of John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan through a strategy that reverses the spread of these weapons, and seeks a world without them. To reduce our stockpiles and launchers, while ensuring our deterrent, the United States and Russia are completing negotiations on the farthest-reaching arms control treaty in nearly two decades. And at April’s Nuclear Security Summit, we will bring forty-four nations together behind a clear goal: securing all vulnerable nuclear materials around the world in four years, so that they never fall into the hands of terrorists.

These diplomatic efforts have also strengthened our hand in dealing with those nations that insist on violating international agreements in pursuit of these weapons. That is why North Korea now faces increased isolation, and stronger sanctions – sanctions that are being vigorously enforced. That is why the international community is more united, and the Islamic Republic of Iran is more isolated. And as Iran’s leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt: they, too, will face growing consequences.

That is the leadership that we are providing – engagement that advances the common security and prosperity of all people. We are working through the G-20 to sustain a lasting global recovery. We are working with Muslim communities around the world to promote science, education and innovation. We have gone from a bystander to a leader in the fight against climate change. We are helping developing countries to feed themselves, and continuing the fight against HIV/AIDS. And we are launching a new initiative that will give us the capacity to respond faster and more effectively to bio-terrorism or an infectious disease – a plan that will counter threats at home, and strengthen public health abroad.

As we have for over sixty years, America takes these actions because our destiny is connected to those beyond our shores. But we also do it because it is right. That is why, as we meet here tonight, over 10,000 Americans are working with many nations to help the people of Haiti recover and rebuild. That is why we stand with the girl who yearns to go to school in Afghanistan; we support the human rights of the women marching through the streets of Iran; and we advocate for the young man denied a job by corruption in Guinea. For America must always stand on the side of freedom and human dignity.

Abroad, America’s greatest source of strength has always been our ideals. The same is true at home. We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal, that no matter who you are or what you look like, if you abide by the law you should be protected by it; that if you adhere to our common values you should be treated no different than anyone else.

We must continually renew this promise. My Administration has a Civil Rights Division that is once again prosecuting civil rights violations and employment discrimination. We finally strengthened our laws to protect against crimes driven by hate. This year, I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are. We are going to crack down on violations of equal pay laws – so that women get equal pay for an equal day’s work. And we should continue the work of fixing our broken immigration system – to secure our borders, enforce our laws, and ensure that everyone who plays by the rules can contribute to our economy and enrich our nations.

In the end, it is our ideals, our values, that built America – values that allowed us to forge a nation made up of immigrants from every corner of the globe; values that drive our citizens still. Every day, Americans meet their responsibilities to their families and their employers. Time and again, they lend a hand to their neighbors and give back to their country. They take pride in their labor, and are generous in spirit. These aren’t Republican values or Democratic values they’re living by; business values or labor values. They are American values.

Unfortunately, too many of our citizens have lost faith that our biggest institutions – our corporations, our media, and yes, our government – still reflect these same values. Each of these institutions are full of honorable men and women doing important work that helps our country prosper. But each time a CEO rewards himself for failure, or a banker puts the rest of us at risk for his own selfish gain, people’s doubts grow. Each time lobbyists game the system or politicians tear each other down instead of lifting this country up, we lose faith. The more that TV pundits reduce serious debates into silly arguments, and big issues into sound bites, our citizens turn away.

No wonder there’s so much cynicism out there.

No wonder there’s so much disappointment.

I campaigned on the promise of change – change we can believe in, the slogan went. And right now, I know there are many Americans who aren’t sure if they still believe we can change – or at least, that I can deliver it.

But remember this – I never suggested that change would be easy, or that I can do it alone. Democracy in a nation of three hundred million people can be noisy and messy and complicated. And when you try to do big things and make big changes, it stirs passions and controversy. That’s just how it is.

Those of us in public office can respond to this reality by playing it safe and avoid telling hard truths. We can do what’s necessary to keep our poll numbers high, and get through the next election instead of doing what’s best for the next generation.

But I also know this: if people had made that decision fifty years ago or one hundred years ago or two hundred years ago, we wouldn’t be here tonight. The only reason we are is because generations of Americans were unafraid to do what was hard; to do what was needed even when success was uncertain; to do what it took to keep the dream of this nation alive for their children and grandchildren.

Our administration has had some political setbacks this year, and some of them were deserved. But I wake up every day knowing that they are nothing compared to the setbacks that families all across this country have faced this year. And what keeps me going – what keeps me fighting – is that despite all these setbacks, that spirit of determination and optimism – that fundamental decency that has always been at the core of the American people – lives on.

It lives on in the struggling small business owner who wrote to me of his company, “None of us,” he said, “…are willing to consider, even slightly, that we might fail.”

It lives on in the woman who said that even though she and her neighbors have felt the pain of recession, “We are strong. We are resilient. We are American.”

It lives on in the 8-year old boy in Louisiana, who just sent me his allowance and asked if I would give it to the people of Haiti. And it lives on in all the Americans who’ve dropped everything to go some place they’ve never been and pull people they’ve never known from rubble, prompting chants of “U.S.A.! U.S.A.! U.S.A!” when another life was saved.

The spirit that has sustained this nation for more than two centuries lives on in you, its people.

We have finished a difficult year. We have come through a difficult decade. But a new year has come. A new decade stretches before us. We don’t quit. I don’t quit. Let’s seize this moment – to start anew, to carry the dream forward, and to strengthen our union once more.

Thank you. God Bless You. And God Bless the United States of America.

Geplaatst in Nieuws/Amerika/VS | Tags: , | Plaats een reactie

State of the Union: focus op banen en begrotingstekort

President Barack Obama hield afgelopen nacht zijn jaarlijkse toespraak tot het Congres over de toestand van de VS en de plannen voor het komende jaar. Het was een belangrijke toespraak, omdat de populariteit van Obama sterk is gedaald en de kritiek op zijn regering neemt toe. Na het verlies van de zetel in de Senaat in Massachusetts waardoor de Democraten de absolute meerderheid van 60 zetels in de Senaat kwijt zijn, is het zaak voor president Obama om duidelijk te maken waar hij met het land heen wil en dat hij echt verandering gaat brengen in Washington en dat de gemiddelde Amerikaan dat ook gaat merken. Hieronder volgen een aantal belangrijke punten uit Obama’s toespraak. De hele State of the Union hier te bekijken en elders op dit weblog na te lezen.

President Obama stelde in zijn toespraak voor om de banken die geld van de regering kregen, zodat ze niet om vielen, en dat geld hebben terug betaald (ongeveer 30 miljoen dollar) te gebruiken om lokale banken te helpen, zodat die dat geld kunnen lenen aan ondernemers en kleine bedrijven om zo banen te creëren. Obama stelde ook voor om de belastingen voor kleine bedrijven te verlagen. Volgens Obama gaat het om één miljoen bedrijven. Door de belastingen te verlagen kunnen deze bedrijven nieuwe werknemers aannemen of de lonen verhogen. Om dit mogelijk te maken riep Obama de Senaat op om de zogenoemde jobs bill aan te nemen, die al door het Huis is aangenomen, zodat banen kunnen worden gecreëerd. De president gaf aan dat hij de wet op zijn bureau wil “without delay” om hem te tekenen Obama zei: “People are out of work. They are hurting. They need our help.”

President Obama gaf in zijn eerste State of the Union ook aan dat Washington aan kijkt tegen een “deficit of trust” en hij riep op tot actie aan “both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue” om de geloofwaardigheid te herstellen. Uit veel peilingen dat Amerikanen weinig geloof in de politiek (lees: de regering en het Congres) hebben.

Obama gaf ook aan dat hij met het Congres en met ministerie Defensie wil werken om het beleid van  “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” af te schaffen. Het beleid houdt in dat homo’s en lesbiennes in het leger niet kunnen uitkomen voor hun seksuele geaardheid. Obama wil dit veranderen.

De president nam ook de tijd om te praten over de verschillen tussen de Democraten en Republikeinen. Obama wil graag bruggen bouwen. Hij wil met de Republikeinen waar mogelijk samen werken, het bipartisanship. Hij maakt zo een gebaar naar onafhankelijke kiezers, die Obama dreigt te verliezen. Politiek analist Candy Crowley van CNN zei over de onafhankelijke kiezers: “[die kiezers] decide elections and who hate, hate, hate partisan bickering.” Obama daarover: “I will not give up. I’m trying to change the tone of our politics.” Hij doelde daar mee op beide partijen. “We were sent here to serve our citizens not our ambitions.”

Na de toespraak kwamen er reacties van belangrijke politici en partijleiders. De nieuwe senator van Massachusetts, Scott Brown zei: “I was pleased to hear President Obama acknowledge that our economy must be a national priority and I applaud him for taking some important first steps. But putting America back to work requires bold action. Bold action means broad-based tax cuts for families and businesses to create jobs and not merely targeted tax relief. Bold action also means major reform and restructuring to actually cut spending and not just freeze it. I look forward to working with my colleagues on both sides of the political aisle on far-reaching new initiatives that will put our economy back on track and get our fiscal house in order.”

De voorzitter van de GOP, Michael Steele zei onder andere: “Tonight, after a year of failed policies and broken promises, President Obama once again demonstrated the rhetorical flair in an attempt to sound populist, if not downright ‘conservative,’ in addressing the very requirements for job creation his administration has ignored for the past year. But, by all accounts, his explanations failed to answer the question on the mind of Americans: ‘When will I get a job?’ Last year, he promised a ‘New Era of Responsibility’ and instead delivered the exact opposite.” En de fractievoorzitter van de Democraten in de Senaat, Harry Reid zei: “Like the President, Senate Democrats are focused on putting Americans back to work, protecting struggling homeowners, strengthening our national security and ensuring affordable health insurance. President Obama engaged America in a conversation about what has worked, what needs improvement and how we can move forward together. Senate Democrats view the challenge of cleaning up the mess we inherited as an opportunity to set our nation back on the path to progress and prosperity.”

Geplaatst in Begroting, Belastingen, Nieuws/Amerika/VS | Tags: , , , , | Plaats een reactie

Twijfels

Bijna een jaar na zijn beëdiging als president heeft Barack Obama toegegeven dat hij soms vervuld wordt met twijfel en teleurstelling als hij met tegenslagen wordt geconfronteerd, zo meldt het Algemeen Dagblad. Obama zei tijdens een toespraak in een kerk in Washington dat hij van binnen niet zo rustig en zeker is als hij uiterlijk lijkt. “Mensen vragen me soms waarom ik zo kalm lijk”, zei Obama tegen honderden gelovigen in Washington. ”Ik moet een bekentenis doen. Er zijn momenten dat ik niet zo kalm ben. Mijn vrouw weet dat. Er zijn momenten waarin vooruitgang te langzaam lijkt te gaan. Er zijn momenten dat de dingen die over mij worden gezegd, pijn doen. Er zijn momenten dat de hatelijkheden steken. Er zijn momenten dat alle inspanningen zinloos lijken”, aldus de president.
 
Obama is befaamd om zijn onverstoorbare uitstraling als hij met problemen wordt geconfronteerd, maar hij erkende dat er soms zware emoties onder de oppervlakte spelen, aldus het Algemeen Dagblad. De president zei dat het geloof hem de innerlijke kracht en rust geeft om door te gaan met wat hij doet. Hij riep ook de kerkgangers op vast te houden aan het geloof.
 
Toen Obama vorig jaar aan de macht kwam na een briljante campagne met strakke oneliners en slogans als “Yes we can” waren de verwachtingen hooggespannen. Maar de magie is grotendeels verdwenen en heeft plaatsgemaakt voor realisme bij de eerste zwarte president van de Verenigde Staten, aldus het Algemeen Dagblad. Obama probeert met wisselend succes een antwoord te vinden op grote binnenlandse en buitenlandse problemen, zoals de economische crisis, de hoge werkloosheid en de oorlog in Afghanistan.
 
De steun onder de bevolking voor Obama is het afgelopen jaar flink gedaald. Dat is overigens niet ongebruikelijk in het eerste jaar van Amerikaanse presidenten (zie bericht Dieptepunt).

Geplaatst in Nieuws/Amerika/VS | Tags: , | Plaats een reactie